Careful treatments of what is usually written in slogans: the right to be forgotten against the right to last, who inherits a digital person, why permanent memory needs a right to contradict yourself.
Not the future in general, but questions with no ready answer today.
Article 17 of the GDPR demands erasure. An immutable ledger answers that it cannot. Two laws in force that cannot both be right.
A person dies, their double keeps answering in their voice. Whose is it? Inheritance law has no such object.
At three in the morning a person says one thing, at nine another, and both are true. A system that remembers everything must not hold the past against them.
One rule, and it is strict.
Article number, date of ruling, size of fine — each checked against the original document, never a retelling.
A separate pass hunts for invented figures and distorted quotes. What it finds is fixed before publication.
If regulators have taken no position, the article says that plainly instead of pretending the matter is settled.